Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 Licensing Changes - CALs Also!

(Updated 5/18/10 based on info from Microsoft)

I heard an ugly rumor yesterday about Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 from Gaby Amar at Softmart saying that in order to use SQL Server 2008 R2 in a server/CAL model you will have to have 2008 R2 CALs as well (typically for R2 releases you don't need an updated CAL). Well...checked it out with Microsoft licensing and he was absolutely correct (I should have known better than to be surprised, LOL)!

Basically, Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 is a major release (think in terms of a release such as Microsoft SQL Server 2000 to Microsoft SQL Server 2005) so don't let the lack of year change in the naming convention fool you.

Customers who have active Microsoft Software Assurance on their exisiting SQL Server products will have the new release rights, but those that don't will need to purchase new licenses in order to run the software (for those who run in Server/CAL mode this means both new server licenses and new CAL licenses).

CAL Requirements

1. If you have Microsoft Software Assurance currently in effect on your SQL Server CALs, then you are entitled to SQL Server 2008 R2 CALs
2. If you do not have Software Assurance, you must have SQL Server 2008 R2 CALs to run SQL Server 2008 R2 using the Server/CAL software licensing model (in other words...don't try to run with your older SQL Server 2008 CALs).

You may be wondering why I'm making such a big deal about this...after all it is a new release, of course new licenses are required. My point is this: it is a departure from how Microsoft has licensed Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 where the Windows Server 2008 CAL can still be used on the newer version Windows Server 2008 R2.

Additionally, there are changes to the processor licensing for SQL Server 2008 R2. You might want to check out some of these resources for more information on this and other SQL Server 2008 R2 changes.

Microsoft has provided the following links for further information on licensing:

• The SQL licensing quick reference guide: http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/licensing.aspx
• Direct link to the guide: http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/7/0/270B6380-8B38-4268-8AD0-F480A139AB19/SQL2008R2_LicensingQuickReference-updated.pdf
• Overall SQL Server 2008 Licensing FAQ: http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/licensing-faq.aspx
• Microsoft SQL Site: http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/
• Product Use Rights has info on the following products: R2 CALs (OCS, System Center Configuration Manager, System Center Operations Manager, System Center Virtual Machine Manager) http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/product-licensing.aspx

For more information on virtualization and SQL Server 2008 R2 check out Andrew Fryer's blog.

If you have any questions - let me know! This is a huge change in Microsoft's licensing trend.

Software Licensing - Gaming the System

It seems in a number of my recent conversations with a major software publisher (who has one of the most complex licensing structures going)...that they keep referencing companies that "Game the System" and what a wrong thing that is to do.

Question - when they make the rules, can you really ever "Game the System"? Don't get me wrong, we specialize in helping customers get creative with how to reduce their licensing costs for their software...but if it's allowed within their convoluted licensing terms, how can you be doing anything wrong?

Take the IRS for example (since it's April 15th), their rules are complex (far more complex than any software publisher) but they expect you to take advantage of every credit that you are entitled to through their rules. They don't call foul and say you're "Gaming the System" when you take advantage of rules that work in your favor. Why should a software publisher?

LOL - yes, I did just compare this software publisher to the IRS...LOL!

Frankly, the ones who write the rules hold the cards - if you can work within those rules and minimize your costs, who are they to complain? If they don't like it, they can change their rules.

What do you think...is it possible to "Game the System" in a negative way?

Resellers and Publishers in the world of Software License Management

I woke up this morning to a great Twitter from a good friend and great coach Jak Plihal (http://www.beingsolutions.com/). It was the quote:

"It is hard to get a man to understand something, if his living depends on him not understanding it." by Upton Sinclair.

To me, this perfectly explains the relationship between resellers (VARs, LARs, and any other acronym that is responsible for selling you software), software publishers and the details of software licensing.

There are details in software licensing agreements and product use rights that can be turned to a benefit for a company in legally reducing their software licensing costs...but you're not going to find them all out by asking your reseller or publisher for help.

Why? Not because they are necessarily trying to mislead you or keep you in ignorance - instead it's because they honestly don't even think of those options...because their living (or magnitude of it) depends on them not thinking of those options.

Now, there are definitely some that are better than others (I love working with Softmart for example as their reps have demonstrated to me a strong ability to keep the customer's needs in focus) but as long as their income relies upon what you buy then Upton Sinclair's quote will continue to apply.

When it comes to negotiating the best deal for licensing - the bulk of the savings opportunities comes from making full use of the product use rights and volume licensing agreements terms - not from the discount you negotiate (or not from the discount you negotiate without knowing these items intimately). Get your advice and education from an independent expert...know in advance who profits from your purchase and what their motivation is so you can better analyze their advice.

Remember, "It is hard to get a man to understand something, if his living depends on him not understanding it." Upton Sinclair.

Thanks Jak!

The Timebomb - IT Backoffice Applications

We seem to spend so much time focusing on desktop licensing and trying to get that right...but frequently it is our IT backoffice applications that get us into trouble.

Despite change control on our desktops and servers, it seems that we continue to find an abnormally high number of IT management tools that are underlicensed. This is also an area where we find a lot of functionality redundancy.

IT will police the end users, but typically no one is policing IT's software. Here are some common costly issues we see at new customers:

Symantec NetBackup - it may be part of standard operations to automatically cover new servers by the technology but where is the automatic purchasing of the necessary additional licenses? Also we frequently see resellers selling the Express program licenses, even when the customer is already a Rewards program customer - make sure you're getting the benefits of your overall Symantec spend on each purchase.

Development/Test/Disaster Recovery - typically all of these instances require licensing. Make sure your servers are licensed appropriately, don't assume you can build a Test server and not license it!

Imaging/Virus scan/Desktop management - yes these are all standards of doing business but frequently they don't get reviewed to ensure that sufficient licenses exist to cover usage.

Client Access Licenses - if you're running Microsoft Windows server, each user or device requires a CAL. If you then add Sharepoint on that server, you also then need a CAL for that. If you're running SQL server to support Sharepoint, you need a CAL or a processor license for SQL. The list goes on and on...if you're using the resources of the server chances are there is a corresponding license requirement. This typically falls to IT to manage.

In short, make sure you're looking at licensing requirements on your IT management apps as well as your end-user apps.

As always, if you need help - let us know!

Software Licensing - 2010

Wow, can't say I'm upset to see the end of 2009! Having been in business since 1999 I've seen some ups and downs (think California, technology, early 2000's...ouch!) and am happy that with business maturity comes a certain tolerance to economy and business shifts...but I'm ready for this year to be over!

What's in store for licensing in 2010? I think we will continue to see a lot of acquisitions occur this year - which means eventual changes to volume licensing agreements. Be sure to keep an eye on mergers, acquisitions and divestitures to see which of your software licenses are impacted. It typically takes at least a year for any changes to volume licensing agreements but it might have a big impact on your maintenance decisions.

For Microsoft users there will be several new releases this year in Office, SharePoint and SQL Server to name a few. SQL Server is also being purported to have a couple of new editions and changes to some of the licensing terms (in particular SQL Enterprise and SQL Datacenter edition). Be sure to keep a close eye on these, especially if you have a virtualized model.

SaaS will continue to feel it's way and don't be surprised to hear more about the Microsoft Enterprise Subscription agreement...an agreement that has long existed but (in my opinion...as is all of this blog) wasn't priced well for most businesses.

Also, for those renewing Microsoft agreements there are some changes to your terms and conditions that you might not be aware of...the loss of the 30 day "grace" period on renewing of Software Assurance and an increase to 90 days for notice of change of reseller (hint, this determines who gets paid for your purchases and impacts any incentives resellers will offer to you - be sure to handle this on a timely basis if changing. You don't want the reseller you're "firing" to get paid for the renewal you do next month.)

What do you expect to see happen with software in 2010? Any licensing trends you know are happening or changes to PURs?

SaaS Contracts - A function of Software Asset Management?

Earlier this month I spoke at the IAITAM conference in Nevada on the topic of Licensing Implications in the Cloud (Saas), it was a lively group and an interesting subject. However; the most interesting piece was the conversation it sparked about "Should Software Asset Management (SAM) be responsible for SaaS?".

For me the not so private laugh was the fact that several audience members asked the question right when we got to my slide asking the same question...always nice to have evidence that I do think like a SAM Manager! OK, thanks for sharing my pat on the back...

This is a topic we hear more frequently at our clients. Does subscription software such as SaaS belong under the SAM umbrella or does it belong elsewhere? Certainly businesses have used subscription software for a long time, and commonly it is not handled by IT but instead handled by the business unit that is using the service (think Payroll, HR services, etc).

I don't think there is a global answer for this, but I would urge companies to think about what's at stake if that subscription is suddenly no longer available. What happens if the provider goes out of business or the server hosting the service fails? These are examples of topics that belong in the contract signed for the service...but will a business unit necessarily think to negotiate these into the contract? How is the usage being tracked to ensure that the billing is accurate? Is the business unit going to track it or are they just going to pay the bills (start thinking telecom audit if you don't think subscription billings can be inaccurate)?

While subscription software services might not fall under the traditional SAM umbrella, it needs to fall under someone's umbrella and the SAM Manager is probably the best suited to take on the challenge.

Would love to hear other's thoughts on this...

Practical Advice to Reduce the Cost of Your Software Spend

It is not uncommon for software licensing and maintenance to be the 1st or 2nd largest budget line item for a company, so for all those companies getting ready to go into their budgeting cycle during this tough economy...reducing that number is going to be key to getting budgets approved and getting other key IT projects into the budget.

Here are some practical steps to reducing the cost of your software spend:

1. Get informed - What software contracts do you have, when do they renew, what soft costs are included in the price tag, who's using the software and why?
2. Clean house - Get rid of items not being used or consolidate where two products cover the same functionality (particularly key in IT management software). Focus on products you're still paying for, not those that aren't costing you any licensing fees currently.
3. Research - For your software contracts, when is the publisher's year end (and by default their quarter ends)? Same thing for your reseller. Can you modify any of your contracts to fit those time periods? What would you want in exchange for making these modifications? What new technology are you implementing this year? Does that tie into any of your publishers "hot new products"?
4. Examine all software maintenance contracts - Is maintenance mandatory or optional, what value have you received from maintenance to date, what is the roadmap for that product for the future and does it fit the timeline of your maintenance fees, are you fully leveraging what you've already spent?
5. Evaluate your software reseller - How many resellers are you using? (If multiple, consider consolidation - and ask for increased savings in return.) How are they performing? What value are they bringing to the table for you? How dialed in are they to the publishers, their product use rights, incentives, licensing programs, roadmaps?
6. Ask for help - Throw a challenge to your resellers and the publishers, have a clear picture of what you want as the outcome and ask for their help in reaching that outcome. Do this early in the game, it doesn't matter if your contract isn't up until next August - is there a significant financial benefit to renewing in December, May, June?
7. Negotiate, Negotiate, Negotiate - Everyone is hurting in this market which means deals will be made. Play fair, recognize that everyone needs to make a profit to survive but make sure that profit includes your company.

This takes some leg work, it takes some investment of time and it takes some creativity but the payoffs are there. Alternatively, ask for help.

What Your Software Inventory Tool Isn't Telling You!

Hopefully by now you've realized that in order to manage your software (or other IT assets) you need to have an inventory tool. As you will know from my other posts, you can't stop there...but it is a good place to start.

However; you need to understand your tool and how it reports data to you. Otherwise you might get an ugly surprise later on down the road when you find software installed on your systems that wasn't showing on your reports!

Inventory tools have a database of software titles associated with publisher and typically associated with a flag to indicate if it is licensable software (versus freeware, etc). The completeness of this database is the biggest value to you of the tool. With most tools if an executable is not in this database than it gets grouped into a "Misc" category and will fall into an exception report, a "catch all" report or might not be reported at all.

This could include new releases from publishers or simply publishers that your tool publisher doesn't categorize. These "unidentified" programs can cause you a lot of headaches - from a security, licensing and support angle.

Most inventory tools are updated on an ongoing basis as the publisher becomes aware of new software, but if you're not keeping current on your maintenance with that software you might not be getting this updated information.

Protect yourself - keep your maintenance current on any inventory tools you use, check the frequency of the tool publishers updates and include a check of "Misc" or "Catch All" software reports in your Software Asset Management process.

Additionally, if you are concerned about potential risk in this area you might want to consider having all of your software identified. Software ID Technologies has services that will identify all software in your environment. We've teamed with them on a number of engagements and they do a good job of taking the mystery out of those "unidentified" applications.

Software Asset Management, Common Sense and Saving Money

Have you ever noticed how cyclical everything seems to be in this world? Well, one of the cycles I've watched since the early 1990's has been Software Asset Management.

The cycle (at least in the US, I frankly didn't track it much internationally) seems to be: Avoiding the topic, Awareness of an issue, Deciding to do something about the problem, Doing a full fledged project, Pairing that project down, Letting nature take care of itself and then the cycle starts again.

Obviously there may be some missing stages and some more "refined" terms than those I used but the basic concept is the same. When times are lush we seem to get into this phase where we feel the need to do a full bore SAM methodology but as soon as money and resources get tight we abandon the methodology in favor of "just making due".

This topic has been reinforced to me lately through two things: (1) a brand new client who emphasized the desire to have a "ala carte" proposal for SAM implementation - our existing clients know that providing options is the ONLY way we work, and (2) reading a fellow SAM practioner's (Kylie Fowler) blog which focuses on the "practical" side of ITAM and SAM (check it out...some great information).

In all our methodologies, let's not loose sight of the basic concept here...SAM is supposed to save money, manage risk and provide the business with the technology tools needed to be competitive. None of this requires complexity, extraordinary costs and it should all fit easily into common sense business practices.

If you're finding yourself ignoring your SAM methodology to run your business, do a quick re-evaluation of the methodology. What is valuable and what is just extra work? Streamline it, modify it, replace it with something simpler...do what you have to do, but don't abandon or ignore it altogether as you'll then be doomed to repeat the cycle (losing out on all those great cost savings and risk management in the meantime!).

If this is still too much for your business right now - consider outsourcing your SAM. We do this for a number of clients and they've found that (a) our costs are ridiculously low compared to in=house, (b) we typically save them more than our annual fee in increased savings, and (c) it frees their staff up to focus on running the business. Talk to me if this is of interest to you.