Intellectual property rights cover a wide spectrum, and while I typically talk to software licensing IP - I don't want to overlook other forms of digital IP that can place an organization at risk if used improperly.
Just because something is available in digital format doesn't mean it can be readily copied, shared or paraphrased. Check those licenses! The hard part is that the digital format frequently makes it that much easier to do something wrong when it comes to IP.
It cost this California company $300,000 because they were internally distributing "press packages" that included unlicensed copies of articles. This was not an intentional act, it was a mistake made by someone who didn't know better...could this happen to your company?
I attended Scott Bain's (SIIA's Litigation Analyst) presentation "Reduce Legal Risks by Managing Digital Content" in June at ECPweb's SAM Summit 2008 in Chicago - a terrific presentation and education for me (I try to be very aware of potential IP issues...but I found that even so I had unknowingly acted illegally in the past when it came to digital piracy).
Let's think about some common examples of potential piracy: Music or Video's stored on your corporate network, subscription based content forwarded through e-mail or stored to the network for others to use, excerpts from e-mail newsletters that you copy and send to others...the list goes on.
I'll let you in on my guilt...like most professionals I get a number of newsletters e-mailed to me on a regular basis. Before I had it pointed out to me that it was wrong, I would think nothing of copying the full contents (author, etc) of an article and sending it to someone I felt would be interested. The problem - those e-mail newsletters are sponsored by companies that pay to have people see their ads...but circumventing the advertising I was cheating them. If you want to share, use the built in mechanism most newsletters have to "Share with a Friend", or send the link to the owners website so the person you're sharing with can access the source. Better yet, check the license terms for sharing the content.
There's a great educational site by the SIIA to help you and your employees make the right choices (www.AskBeforeYouAct.com). Digital assets are a bit tougher to monitor than software assets, but they are every bit as important to manage them appropriately.
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Do It Yourself or Have a Professional Do It For You?
Sorry I've been rather quiet the past couple of months...we've been launching a new service (or more accurately - finally marketing an old service) and that's been distracting me a bit.
What we're doing is finally offering our SAM managed services offering (LOL...OK, when we started doing this 10 years ago we were calling it Outsourcing) to all of our clients.
Basically, we do everything to give you the information you need to run your business with the appropriate software licensing at the appropriate cost. See, for us - that's easy. We live and breathe software licensing, processes, controls and negotiations. We keep up with what's going on in the marketplace, because it's our business. Typically companies (excluding large enterprises) simply can't dedicate the resources to do this in a cost efficient manner. For us to do it, the service pays for itself and you're not running the risk that you're relying on a staff member whose knowledge is from 2 versions ago.
We're not looking to replace your current staff members...we're looking to free up their time so they can focus on areas that move you forward.
However; I'm curious, what are your thoughts?...What would you want in such a service? How often would you want it? What would you want to pay for it? Would you want a service like this?
What we're doing is finally offering our SAM managed services offering (LOL...OK, when we started doing this 10 years ago we were calling it Outsourcing) to all of our clients.
Basically, we do everything to give you the information you need to run your business with the appropriate software licensing at the appropriate cost. See, for us - that's easy. We live and breathe software licensing, processes, controls and negotiations. We keep up with what's going on in the marketplace, because it's our business. Typically companies (excluding large enterprises) simply can't dedicate the resources to do this in a cost efficient manner. For us to do it, the service pays for itself and you're not running the risk that you're relying on a staff member whose knowledge is from 2 versions ago.
We're not looking to replace your current staff members...we're looking to free up their time so they can focus on areas that move you forward.
Our service has been extremely successful - we've been told by our clients that the price is attractive, the deliverables timely and needed, and the independent relationship (not the reseller, etc) extremely beneficial and ties in well with internal governance programs.
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Here We Go Again...
Let's take a walk down memory lane....the year is 1994 and a mid-size national firm (1,200 PC's) has a new software manager who realizes that the firm needs to be buying their software on a volume license, so she starts down the path of finding out everything she needs to know to make this happen.
Since there's no one she can find who can educate her on this, she turns to her reseller...who invests a lot of time and energy into educating her. Finally, time comes to seal the deal and another reseller walks in the door and tells her a few more things that the first reseller didn't tell her....things that would have a strong impact on the financial viability of the purchase.
Time passes, this software manager continues to learn and comes to realize that there were even more things she should have been told that neither reseller told her...that money was lost on the deal because she hadn't known them when the deal was made. Unfortunately, there hadn't been anyone to advise her that didn't have a vested interest in the deal.
Fast forward to 2008, that software manager (and yes...that was me) would no longer have to rely on the advice of a reseller...there are instead a number of small Software Asset Management (SAM) consulting firms that would appropriately advise her on all important aspects of the deal - helping her make the right choice and the best deal for her business.
However; we have to be careful that this valuable source of independent information remains available to consumers.
Most major resellers are now starting up SAM consulting businesses in response to publisher requirements. Here's the problem with that...since consulting isn't the primary business line a reseller can price their consulting services at a price that an independent firm can't compete with...and the next thing you know, the only source of information for you on that major purchase is someone who has a vested interest in the outcome...
Are we coming full circle? I hope not - the reason I started my firm in 1999 was because I saw a need for companies to have someone on their side of the deal....whether it's me or another small SAM firm, I don't want companies to lose that independent perspective.
What are your thoughts?
Since there's no one she can find who can educate her on this, she turns to her reseller...who invests a lot of time and energy into educating her. Finally, time comes to seal the deal and another reseller walks in the door and tells her a few more things that the first reseller didn't tell her....things that would have a strong impact on the financial viability of the purchase.
Time passes, this software manager continues to learn and comes to realize that there were even more things she should have been told that neither reseller told her...that money was lost on the deal because she hadn't known them when the deal was made. Unfortunately, there hadn't been anyone to advise her that didn't have a vested interest in the deal.
Fast forward to 2008, that software manager (and yes...that was me) would no longer have to rely on the advice of a reseller...there are instead a number of small Software Asset Management (SAM) consulting firms that would appropriately advise her on all important aspects of the deal - helping her make the right choice and the best deal for her business.
However; we have to be careful that this valuable source of independent information remains available to consumers.
Most major resellers are now starting up SAM consulting businesses in response to publisher requirements. Here's the problem with that...since consulting isn't the primary business line a reseller can price their consulting services at a price that an independent firm can't compete with...and the next thing you know, the only source of information for you on that major purchase is someone who has a vested interest in the outcome...
Are we coming full circle? I hope not - the reason I started my firm in 1999 was because I saw a need for companies to have someone on their side of the deal....whether it's me or another small SAM firm, I don't want companies to lose that independent perspective.
What are your thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)